From: Stefan Ottosson (sot at lysator.liu.se) Date: Sun Jul 20 11:10:20 EDT 2003 |
|
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Robby Findler wrote: > It isn't a tail call because it must evaluate E1, then evaluate E2, and > then return E1's result. Ok, so I was being naive then. Hmm.. I guess there's just no way to do something like pop a stack after the tail call, but still return the value of the tail call, without turning it into a recursive process?
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|