| From: Manfred Wuttke (wuttke at bitel.net) Date: Tue Jul 8 12:56:12 EDT 2003 |
|
Am Montag, 7. Juli 2003 23:25 schrieben Sie: >Keith Frost > Not at all. > (define x #10(-14 2)) > (display x) > ;; ==> #(-14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2) > Katsmall T. Wise, Esquire >Thus, #3(-14 2) is in fact the same as #3(-14 2 2). Hello all, thank you very much for your answers. It's an intellectual and aesthetic pleasure for me to learn Scheme ... and I learn also in areas I didn't believe! Manfred
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}