From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Sat Jan 25 08:42:46 EST 2003 |
|
At Sun, 12 Jan 2003 15:12:17 -0500 (EST), dvanhorn at emba.uvm.edu wrote: > With `regexp-match' the second argument may be an input-port. Is there a > reason > for not providing that functionality for `regexp-match*'? Not a good one. The latest code in CVS supports input ports, too. Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|