From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Wed Apr 9 15:03:12 EDT 2003 |
|
At Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:48:39 -0400, "Neil W. Van Dyke" wrote: > One more question: Are there cases in which the class of an instance > must be hidden from *methods of its superclass*? Offhand, I can't see any need for that protection. This sounds like a feature that some other language might have explored (and maybe kept). Does anyone know? Matthew
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|