From: Paul Steckler (steck at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Thu Nov 7 15:04:59 EST 2002 |
|
> 2.5) Add a "deleted" field and replace send with a send that checks > deleted before actually sending the message. This solution sounds like the most obvious to me. When you send an oval% instance the `delete' message, you're updating its state somehow. So why not use that state information when processing other messages sent to it? -- Paul
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|