On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Jay McCarthy <<a href="mailto:jay.mccarthy@gmail.com">jay.mccarthy@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > I feel that the only thing it could do better is support two more > options for #:data: > - A input-port? to read from and copy to the HTTP connection > - A (-> output-port? void) function to call with the HTTP connection's > output port to stream the data > > But I'd like a second opinion before adding them. Those both sound great, but why force the second one return `void?` For example, I might want to stream the data directly into a JSON parser. Sam