<div dir="ltr">You could set PLT_SETUP_OPTIONS to "-j <N>".<div><br></div><div>Robby</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:samth@ccs.neu.edu" target="_blank">samth@ccs.neu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Flatt <<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> >> * Similarly, that build shows that Racket detects itself as having<br> >> many more CPUs than it actually has.<br> ><br> > On Linux, the processor count comes from sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN).<br> > Should Racket use something else?<br> <br> </div>I talked to the Travis people, and it's just a limitation of the<br> virtualization software they're using, that it reports the underlying<br> hardware number.<br> <br> This suggests that maybe there should be a CPU=N argument to the<br> top-level Makefile to control how many processors `raco setup` uses.<br> Annoyingly, this can't be detected from the -j argument to `make` [1].<br> <br> Sam<br> <br> [1] <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/q/10898528/349661" target="_blank">http://stackoverflow.com/q/10898528/349661</a><br> <div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_________________________<br> Racket Developers list:<br> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>