<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><br></div><div>Fundamental to me is Robby's "necessary to install packages". One day we may wish to offer sandboxing for the installation of packages. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:51 AM, Carl Eastlund wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">What does being "so fundamental" have to do with being in the core vs being in a package?  We should not confuse putting things in packages with making them second-class concepts.  We can put racket/sandbox in a package without necessarily making it any less fundamental to Racket.<br> <div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div>Carl Eastlund</div> <br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Matthias Felleisen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthias@ccs.neu.edu" target="_blank">matthias@ccs.neu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br> In general I agree with Robby on "the definition of the core as "minimum stuff to get pkgs running" and we should be picky about what goes in". BUT, as a small addendum, I think the idea of sandboxing is so fundamental, I'd rather see the idea (not necessarily the current implementation) become a part of the core.<br> <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br> -- Matthias<br> </font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br> <br> _________________________<br>   Racket Developers list:<br>   <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev</a><br> <br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div> </blockquote></div><br></body></html>