<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Eli Barzilay <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eli@barzilay.org" target="_blank">eli@barzilay.org</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">To clarify, because of reasons that I won't go into on the list, the<br> actual chances of me getting this implemented (and of such a change<br> being accepted) are pretty much in the area of "slim to none". </blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's a bummer. At first sight I'd have thought that it would have just <br>been a matter of creating a directory with the same name as the package,<br> and then decompressing the package into that directory.<br><br>But I guess things are always way more complicated than at first sight...<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> TBH,<br> the chances of implementing an `in-url' are low too, but they're<br> probably higher than going into the package system.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That would be nice, but I'd much much prefer to see the single-collection<br>package thing implemented.<br><br></div><div>Laurent<br> </div><br></div></div></div>