<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><a href="https://github.com/jarnaldich/racket-git" target="_blank" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">https://github.com/jarnaldich/racket-git</a><div> Looks like progress was made but currently moribund.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Danny Yoo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dyoo@hashcollision.org" target="_blank">dyoo@hashcollision.org</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Ray Racine <<a href="mailto:ray.racine@gmail.com">ray.racine@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > I saw a blurb this week where Microsoft is using <a href="http://libgit2.github.com/" target="_blank">http://libgit2.github.com/</a><br> > to add git support into their tooling (Visual Studio no less) and their devs<br> > have been committing to fill in any MS specific git gaps. It looks like a<br> > top quality project, claiming to be small, clean, no-deps, and cross<br> > platform smooth. Is the option to use Racket's FFI to libgit2 just a time<br> > and resources thing?<br> <br> </div>I think so. It's one of the Intro Projects listed in the wiki:<br> <br> <a href="https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects" target="_blank">https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects</a><br> <br> It looks like Joan Arnaldich has started work on it:<br> <br> <a href="https://github.com/jarnaldich/racket-git" target="_blank">https://github.com/jarnaldich/racket-git</a><br> </blockquote></div><br></div>