A point to consider here is that this should also be the place for a future profiler thing, and maybe other less pref-y things... <div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 11, 2012 6:39 PM, "Robby Findler" <<a href="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> Better than "tools", IMO. How about "perf"? Ie, perf/future-visualizer and perf/optimization-coach/ ? Robby On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Vincent St-Amour <<a href="mailto:stamourv@ccs.neu.edu">stamourv@ccs.neu.edu</a>> wrote: > (Performance) tuning? > > Vincent > > > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:04:46 -0500, > Robby Findler wrote: >> >> tools seems like too generic of a word. Is there something like >> "performance-debugging" that isn't so long? >> >> Robby >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Vincent St-Amour <<a href="mailto:stamourv@ccs.neu.edu">stamourv@ccs.neu.edu</a>> wrote: >> > At Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:33:02 -0400, >> > Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >> Or maybe add a new "tools" collection for other similar things? >> > >> > I'm about to push the new version of Optimization Coach (formerly >> > Performance Report). Since it now works with any language (not just TR), >> > it would make sense to move it outside of the `typed-racket' collect. >> > It would be a good candidate for the `tools' collection. >> > >> > Vincent </blockquote></div>