That sounds fine to me. <div><br></div><div>-James </div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Eli Barzilay <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eli@barzilay.org">eli@barzilay.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">40 minutes ago, James Swaine wrote:<br>
> Here's the release note for futures:<br>
><br>
> - futures: added fsemaphores; 'future' primitive now no longer<br>
> freezes futures; improved the logging messages futures produce<br>
<br>
</div>How about this:<br>
<br>
* futures: added `fsemaphore' values to `racket/future'; the<br>
`future' primitive no longer freezes futures so a future can spawn<br>
new futures; improved log messages.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:<br>
<a href="http://barzilay.org/" target="_blank">http://barzilay.org/</a> Maze is Life!<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>