| From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Sun Jul 20 02:27:29 EDT 2014 |
|
At Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
> argument that flattens all the way down?
>
> I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in
> compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all?
> argument.
I don't think so. Eagerly flattening would break examples like
(begin
(define begin +)
(begin 1 2)))
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|