From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Sun Jul 20 02:27:29 EDT 2014 |
|
At Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all? > argument that flattens all the way down? > > I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in > compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all? > argument. I don't think so. Eagerly flattening would break examples like (begin (define begin +) (begin 1 2)))
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|