[racket-dev] flatten-begin

On 2014-07-18 09:52:26 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Unless someone knows why it is a bad idea, how about adding a #:all?
> argument that flattens all the way down?
>
> I don't see many uses of flatten-begin in our tree, but the one in
> compatibility/package sure looks like it could use the #:all?
> argument. Ditto the one in TR (in class-prims.rkt). And I'm pretty
> sure that replacing the hand-rolled loops in drracket for doing this
> (they predate that library) would use the #:all? argument if they were
> rewritten.

This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case
too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change)

Cheers,
Asumu