[racket-dev] `collection-path' Considered Brittle

At Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:49:44 -0600,
Robby Findler wrote:
> collection-path is legacy and should generally be removed when you find it
> (I think I fixed two uses of it Saturday in fact).

The documentation does mention that `collection-file-path' is usually
preferred, but it doesn't make it clear that `collection-path' is
legacy. I'll think of a stronger wording.

> But hopefully you could use collection-file-path in most cases instead of a
> collections-path function.

I pushed a fix for the macro stepper, using `collections-file-path'.

Vincent