[racket-dev] proposal for moving to packages

From: Philippe Meunier (meunier at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue May 21 09:59:57 EDT 2013

Jay McCarthy wrote:
>If you have the source, then you need all the phase >= 1 dependencies,
>but if you just have the binary then you only need the phase = 0 deps.

That's assuming that you want to run the source, but I think that the
people who are arguing about still having the source available in the
distribution are mostly interested in reading the source, in which
case having only the source for the phase = 0 dependencies would
probably be a good enough approximation...


Posted on the dev mailing list.