[racket-dev] else clauses: possible change to match?

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote:

> I don't like warnings that are basically admitting weaknesses in the
> language design....


Ah, that's the answer my subconscious was seeking when I wondered about
Racket warnings. Good point!

FWIW, I'd vote (with my voting weight being around the epsilons) for a
change in else/match too, as I hardly see someone binding else in match
intentionally, and hoping to get away with it.
At best, some old buggy programs will magically start working ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130503/fc466a6b/attachment.html>