| From: Neil Toronto (neil.toronto at gmail.com) Date: Mon Mar 18 12:14:13 EDT 2013 |
|
On 03/18/2013 07:53 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > The JIT could be improved to avoid switching between consecutive > operations, but does the cost of this approach look reasonable as a > start? IMO, yes. The only other good options for higher precision are Racket's rationals and `math/bigfloat', which are both much slower. Compared to those, a 2x penalty for addition and subtraction is nothing. Neil ⊥
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}