[racket-dev] Things we could move out of the core

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 27 23:06:39 EDT 2013

One fairly clear thing is that the mzlib manual can move into the
compatibility-lib.

We could move the mzlib-specific files from (the collection) tests/racket
into a new tests/mzlib and put that into the compatibility-lib.

But that probably requires actual adjustments because tests/racket is
load-based ...

Probably all of the mzlib-specific tests could be made to run in a #lang
context without too much trouble, tho.

Robby

On Thursday, June 27, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:

> I've kept tests and docs where they are, because I don't know what, if
> any, plans Matthew might already have about splitting those.  I'm
> happy to follow such plans as needed.
>
> Sam
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Robby Findler
> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> > Is there a plan for moving the mzlib tests and docs from pkgs/racket-lib
> to
> > pkgs/compatibility-lib? (I didn't move the mzlib/contract ones yet
> because I
> > wasn't sure what to do. I can do stuff, tho, if you're not already.)
> >
> > Robby
> >
> > On Thursday, June 27, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, since `scheme/mzscheme` is the same language for the (many) parts
> >> of the core that need it.  There are a number of other small bits that
> >> I'll do as well.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Robby Findler
> >> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> >> > Did you consider moving "#lang mzscheme" out as well?
> >> >
> >> > Robby
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, June 27, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I've now pushed this set of changes, which pass all the racket tests
> >> >> and build the whole system cleanly.  I think the next steps are:
> >> >>
> >> >> - Robby is going to move mzlib/contract.
> >> >> - Matthew is going to modify mzlib/compiler and mzlib/unit200.
> >> >> - Ryan is working on shrinking the db collection.
> >> >> - I posted about shrinking the `pkg` collection and working toward
> >> >> removing parts of the `net` collection.
> >> >>
> >> >> There are also some parts of some collections that aren't needed.
> Much
> >> >> of `openssl` could go if `pkg` was split. The decompiler and
> >> >> demodularizer could potentially be moved out. Perhaps distributed
> >> >> places could move.
> >> >>
> >> >> Other things to would, in my estimation, be much harder, and would
> >> >> probably be things that are part of `#lang racket`, like the class or
> >> >> unit systems or `match`, or things that are deeply intertwined with
> >> >> `raco setup`, like planet.
> >> >>
> >> >> Sam
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Robby Findler
> >> >> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> >> >> > I can move mzlib/contract after you get done with other stuff.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Robby
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> >> >> >> <samth at ccs.neu.edu>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> > While moving some files around between packages, I realized that
> >> >> >> > there
> >> >> >> > are a number of things that could be moved out of the core and
> >> >> >> > into
> >> >> >> > packages.  Here's a partial list of things that I think are not
> >> >> >> > needed
> >> >> >> > at all by the rest of the core:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've now done the first step of this work.  You can see the
> results
> >> >> >> here: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/373
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This works to the degree that the core still compiles.  No other
> >> >> >> testing has happened yet -- that's the next step. A number of
> >> >> >> packages
> >> >> >> will need additional dependencies.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'd like to get feedback on exactly how this is organized.  In
> >> >> >> particular, a bunch of things are now in a `compatibility-lib`
> >> >> >> collection:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> * almost all of `mzlib`
> >> >> >> * `compatibility/*`
> >> >> >> * `racket/mpair` and `racket/mlist`
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> There's also the following new packages: `e
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130627/746fc435/attachment.html>

Posted on the dev mailing list.