[racket-dev] single-collection packages

Much better indeed, but maybe there is still some redundancy left with
the `setup-collects'
option?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/metadata.html

Laurent


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu>wrote:

>
> +1
>
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> So, I think it's better to define `collection':
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > I think this is a definite improvement.
> >
> > Sam
> > _________________________
> >  Racket Developers list:
> >  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130626/8f4638c8/attachment-0001.html>