[racket-dev] Racket build dependencies

It looks like get-module-code from syntax/modcode does what I want
internally.  I've submitted a pull request on github in which I've split
out the two extra functions I need using the functionality that exists.  I
"modernized" the Racket style in that file before making the changes --
turning let into define and so forth.  That makes this a fairly big change,
line-by-line; sorry about that, I know it makes reading the diff tougher,
but it made it easier to figure out what I was working with in the file.

Carl Eastlund

On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:

> I'm trying to make a "raco make"-like command for ACL2 certification of
> Dracula programs.  Given a Racket program written using the Dracula
> language, the command extracts a proof obligation, saves it as a .lisp
> file, and runs ACL2 on it.  There are a couple pieces of the Racket build
> system that I don't know how to get at, in making this process work.
>
> (1) I don't want to recreate the proof obligation files if they are
> up-to-date.  For this I need to get the name of the compiled .zo file for a
> module for comparison.  Is this functionality available somewhere?  I might
> also need the path of the module's source code, but I assume that's what
> resolved-module-path-name gives me.  Right?
>
> (2) I want to respect settings like PLTCOMPILEDROOTS when deciding where
> to save the proof obligation file.  Basically I want to mangle the module's
> source file name the same way as compilation does, except instead of
> <SOURCE>_rkt.zo I want to create <SOURCE>_rkt.lisp or some such.  Is _this_
> functionality available somewhere?
>
> I think that's all I would need to get started.  Any help would be
> appreciated, thanks.
>
> Carl Eastlund
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130610/c8ed3241/attachment-0001.html>