[racket-dev] PLaneT(2): Single vs multi-collection packages

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 6 11:36:16 EDT 2013

At Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:17:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > If we go that way, then I'd characterize a single-collection package
> > without 'single-collection' in "info.rkt" as a low-quality package, but
> > a low-quality package is a fine starting point for a high-quality
> > package.
> 
> Would this characterization be something reflected in any of the
> software, or just a recommendation we make to packagers?

Mostly a recommendation, but it might correspond to a software-enforced
constraint on ring-0 packages (for which DrDr runs tests).


Posted on the dev mailing list.