From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Mon Jul 29 20:21:30 EDT 2013 |
|
It sounds fine to me to change the docs. At Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:00:03 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any reason for the documented contract on `alarm-evt` to > specify a non-negative real? The function will happily accept negative > inputs and it seems like that's desirable (if for some reason your > computer clock is set to before 1970 for a good reason). > > Cheers, > Asumu
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|