[racket-dev] union-find

This is probably a silly question, but don't you also need some way to
check if two sets have been unioned?  Does your application not need
that?

Sam

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> I've just pushed an implementation of the union-find algorithm to the data/
> collection. I didn't do it quite the way wikipedia recommends, but instead
> made the sets be little containers whose canonical element can be mutated.
>
> This suits my purposes well, but I wanted to ask if someone on the list
> knows why the wikipedia way is better.
>
> Also, I wasn't sure about the names, so I put "uf-" on the front of
> everything to discourage people from using this when they really want
> racket/set. Maybe there is a better way, tho?
>
> Robby
>
>
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>