[racket-dev] XREPL , log not working with extra log-receiver vector element in 5.3.2.1?

Sorry for the false alarm.

Although I'm still waiting for the build of latest to finish, on
GitHub I discovered I'm missing
2a1f70264c0b0d9528a7802b7e01dbe002db39aa from 6 days ago.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Greg Hendershott
<greghendershott at gmail.com> wrote:
> Building as of 3312a806 from Jan 7:
>
> Welcome to Racket v5.3.2.1.
> -> ,log debug
> -> (log-debug "hi")
> -> ; match: no matching clause for '#(debug "hi"
> #<continuation-mark-set> #f) [,bt
> ;   for context]
>
> Whereas:
>
> Welcome to Racket v5.3.1.
> -> ,log debug
> -> (log-debug "hi")
> -> ; [debug] hi #<continuation-mark-set>
>
> It's re the `match` in this code in xrepl.rkt:
>
>   (when level
>     (let ([r (make-log-receiver global-logger level)])
>       (current-log-receiver-thread
>        (thread
>         (λ ()
>           (let loop ()
>             (match (sync r)
>               [(vector l m v)
>                (display (format "; [~a] ~a~a\n"
>                                 l m (if v (format " ~.s" v) "")))
>                (flush-output)])
>             (loop))))))))
>
> It looks like the log-receiver vector got an extra, 4th element?
>
>
> p.s. I'm doing a fetch of latest, and rebuild as I type this...
>
>
> p.p.s. I have an open pull request to enhance XREPL for the loggers
> added in 5.3.1:
>
> https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/188
>
> Eli had some concerns about it, and I wasn't expecting it to be merged
> for 5.3.2.
>
> Anyway that's a different matter, from what I'm emailing about now.
> AFIK the change with log-receiver sync vector popped up fairly
> recently (I think??).