[racket-dev] [plt] Push #26225: master branch updated
I think you can just add it to for.rktl:
(test '(1 2 3)
'put-a-descriptive-name-here
(let ()
(define (in-X #:x seq) seq)
(for/list ([x (in-X #:x '(1 2 3))]) x)
;; => '(1 2 3)
(define-sequence-syntax in-X* (lambda () #'in-X) (lambda (stx) #f))
(for/list ([x (in-X* #:x '(1 2 3))]) x)))
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Ryan Culpepper <ryanc at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> I sent a test case to Matthew, since I wasn't sure how best to include it:
> it is a syntax error in the old version of the code. Here it is:
>
> (define (in-X #:x seq) seq)
> (for/list ([x (in-X #:x '(1 2 3))]) x)
> ;; => '(1 2 3)
> (define-sequence-syntax in-X* (lambda () #'in-X) (lambda (stx) #f))
> (for/list ([x (in-X* #:x '(1 2 3))]) x)
> ;; => '(1 2 3), previously syntax error
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
> On 02/06/2013 08:08 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> Test case?
>>
>> Robby
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:08 PM, <ryanc at racket-lang.org
>> <mailto:ryanc at racket-lang.org>**> wrote:
>>
>> ryanc has updated `master' from 117c81e2a6 to a85a71984d.
>> http://git.racket-lang.org/**plt/117c81e2a6..a85a71984d<http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/117c81e2a6..a85a71984d>
>>
>> =====[ One Commit ]=============================**
>> ========================
>> Directory summary:
>> 100.0% collects/racket/private/
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> a85a719 Ryan Culpepper <ryanc at racket-lang.org
>> <mailto:ryanc at racket-lang.org>**> 2013-02-06 17:55
>>
>> :
>> | preserve lexical context, src, etc for sequence syntax expansion
>> |
>> | The previous version of the code replaced the implicit #%app with
>> | the kernel #%app (ie, #%plain-app), causing sequence functions
>> | that take keyword arguments to fail.
>> :
>> M collects/racket/private/for.**rkt | 3 ++-
>>
>> =====[ Overall Diff ]=============================**
>> ======================
>>
>> collects/racket/private/for.**rkt
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**~
>> --- OLD/collects/racket/private/**for.rkt
>> +++ NEW/collects/racket/private/**for.rkt
>> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@
>> (if (identifier? stx)
>> (proc1)
>> (datum->syntax stx
>> - #`(#,(proc1) . #,(cdr (syntax-e
>> stx)))
>> + ;; Use cons, not #`(#,op #, at args),
>> to avoid replacing implicit #%app binding
>> + (cons (proc1) (cdr (syntax-e stx)))
>> stx
>> stx)))
>> proc1)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________
>> Racket Developers list:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/**dev <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130206/8d36a5b4/attachment.html>