[racket-dev] 5.3.3

This one seems maybe okay:

https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/3e3608ccb82de7e14b0b3aed223d95c7d5a500ba

but the other one definitely seems like too much. And I'm not sure that
that one is a good idea. I think it is, but I'd want to try something like
that for a while before releasing it.


On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Danny Yoo <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Robby Findler
> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> > Do you have a commit in mind? (It would need to a simple one that is
> easily
> > seen to be "correct".)
>
>
> I'm thinking of the two commits currently on my compiler-hack branch:
>
>
> https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/1caae27ded89a46453316f65ae5cbf7b04a4bd66
>
> https://github.com/dyoo/racket/commit/3e3608ccb82de7e14b0b3aed223d95c7d5a500ba
>
> to address the immediate problem of the PLanet2 stuff.  I hadn't
> merged into upstream because I was waiting to hear about the exact
> right paths to include in the manager-skip-file-handler in the second
> commit, and did not hear consensus.
>
>
> I'm also partial to the gunzip fix in
>
> http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/commit/c6775cc0605dfed29e347f1932adcc11b5e220db
> .
>  I ran across this in the context of broken PLaneT2 package
> installation, since PLanet2 defaults to .zip archives.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130206/1586adf6/attachment.html>