[racket-dev] long double for racket

At Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:04:29 +0400, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> One thing is not quite clear from your message:
> if Mikhail now starts to work on unboxing, will not he
> be duplicating your own work? You said
> 
> > Unboxing of locally-bound extflonums is still not implemented, but I
> > think it's probably not too far away.
> 
> so I am wondering whether it has already happened.

No, I have not worked on that --- I'll wait for Mikhail's patch.

Thanks!