[racket-dev] Lists aren't sets, but have set-like operations

On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Carl Eastlund wrote:

> 
> Here's what I propose to do now:
> 
> - rename set? to generic-set?; this predicate recognizes the new all-inclusive generic set type
> - rename set-immutable? to set?; this predicate recognizes the pre-existing immutable hash set type
> - leave set-mutable? and set-weak? alone; they recognize the other two hash set types (on the mutability axis)
> - allow multiple-set operations to combine equal-based hash sets and lists, since both use equal? for equality


Sounds like the right direction to me. -- Matthias

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130822/a98e2d3c/attachment-0001.html>