[racket-dev] Packages

A few minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I stand by my recommendation from December:
> 
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/2012-December/011218.html
> 
> That is, I think this suggestion should be phrased as a patch.
> 
> As implied in my quote below, I tried something much like you're
> describing, and I was unhappy with the resulting complications.
> Maybe I implemented the idea wrong, and maybe you'll come with
> something better --- all the more reason to phrase your suggestion
> as a patch.

The question is whether such a patch is worth working on it or not.
(And I'm assuming that you're suggesting that that such a patch is
fine if it's possible to implement without me realizing on the way
some reasons against it.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!