[racket-dev] Is this expected behavior?

From: Asumu Takikawa (asumu at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 17 14:25:37 EDT 2012

On 2012-09-17 11:39:55 -0600, Jordan Schatz wrote:
> On a freshly pulled and compiled racket:

This is a known bug, see PR 13096:

It does indeed seem to be an issue with submodules, but the precise
problem is hard to track down.


Posted on the dev mailing list.