[racket-dev] compatibility/package

There was a thread I saw on 7/30 that suggested we leave things where
they are (and that's what I also think we should do).

Robby

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> Wasn't there a decision to keep `racket/package' where it is instead
> of moving it to `compatibility'?
>
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev