[racket-dev] 'case' using equal?

+1


On Nov 26, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

> I think we should change 'case'. 
> 
> I think we should also add a clear note to the documentation for case saying "this is not the same as 'case' in Scheme because it uses equal?, not eqv?" and giving a few examples to show the difference to head off any confusion.
> 
> Robby
> 
> On Monday, November 26, 2012, Jon Zeppieri wrote:
> The 'case-check' branch of my github fork now implements Robby's
> suggestion. [https://github.com/97jaz/racket/tree/case-check]
> 
> I ran the full build (including documentation), ran
> collects/tests/run-automated-tests.rkt, and started up and played
> around with DrRacket. The only logged messages were from the tests I
> added, which specifically test the new behavior.
> 
> -Jon
> 
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Jon Zeppieri <zeppieri at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks! -J
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jon Zeppieri <zeppieri at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is there a way to give check-em a type for TR without breaking it for
> >>> non-typed code?
> >>
> >> Yes, you should add an entry to typed-racket/base-env/base-special-env
> >> for `check-em`.  Note that you'll have to specify which module
> >> `check-em` is defined in.
> >>
> >> --
> >> sam th
> >> samth at ccs.neu.edu
> _________________________
>  Racket Developers list:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4373 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20121126/e96e786c/attachment-0001.p7s>