[racket-dev] Racket installs more files on amd64 than on i386

It's a problem with the contract boundary. The examples work fine in 
Typed Racket. The problem type is this:

(: flomap-transform
    (case->
     (flomap Flomap-Transform -> flomap)
     (flomap Flomap-Transform Integer Integer Integer Integer
             -> flomap)))

The contract system claims that `flomap-transform' breaks its own 
contract. This is clearly bogus, so TR must be generating the wrong 
contract for it.

Still, I should have caught this, and I apologize. I'll do penance by... 
writing a bug report? Probably not enough.

Neil ⊥

On 11/18/2012 05:40 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Sounds like a bug to me, then.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Robby
>
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> <iam at juanfra.info> wrote:
>> On 11/19/12 01:13, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe the difference is that there is a bug on x86, then, as in my
>>> copy of that file I see a bunch of errors in the Compositing docs.
>>>
>>> Do you see errors in one installation and images in the other?
>>
>>
>> Yes. I see errors (red text in the web page) in both archs. Images only on
>> amd64.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Robby
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Ray Racine <ray.racine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> file:///usr/local/racket/doc/images/Spatial_Transformations.html?q=Compositing
>>>>
>>>> It is being generated and used as part of the standard doc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Ray Racine <ray.racine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have it as well.  Seems to be in the git repo.  Google of the phrase
>>>>> is
>>>>> interesting as well.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
>>>>> <iam at juanfra.info> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/19/12 00:08, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are they?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The most of the images say "we claim the privilege". One is the US
>>>>>> Congress.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Robby
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
>>>>>>> <iam at juanfra.info> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm seeing a weird behavior of the installation of Racket 5.3.1 on
>>>>>>>> OpenBSD
>>>>>>>> (I don't know if other OS are affected or not).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On amd64 Racket installs this files:
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_168.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_169.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_170.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_171.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_172.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_173.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_174.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_175.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_176.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_177.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_178.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_179.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_180.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_181.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_182.png
>>>>>>>> /usr/local/share/racket/doc/images/pict_183.png
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On i386 Racket doesn't install these files. I use the same options
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> compile both packages. Any idea?
>>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________
>>   Racket Developers list:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
> _________________________
>    Racket Developers list:
>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>