[racket-dev] current-*-port

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Danny Yoo <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu> wrote:

> > IMO, anyone who is not coming from some kind of Scheme background
> > would view this as ridiculously long.  If they're renamed to the usual
> > names, things look much better:
> >
> >  (parameterize ([stderr (stdout)])
> >    ...)
>
>
> Definitely +1.
>

add1

--Carl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20120503/7d4dec15/attachment.html>