From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Sun Mar 11 11:50:11 EDT 2012 |
|
On Mar 10, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I first > thought that the whole point of allowing a sub-`module' would be to > have some otherwise-inaccessible private code in it (as the fictitious > author of that `my-code' module thinks). I second this impression, as I have done in previous private message.
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|