[racket-dev] Hyperbolic functions

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 26 12:55:24 EDT 2012

On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> But if the goal is to have *much* more mathy functions, then it seems
> better to just have a new toplevel collection.

Yes. And including some from the Science collection would be a good thing, assuming Doug is okay with it. 

Posted on the dev mailing list.