| From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Tue Jun 26 12:55:24 EDT 2012 |
|
On Jun 26, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > But if the goal is to have *much* more mathy functions, then it seems > better to just have a new toplevel collection. Yes. And including some from the Science collection would be a good thing, assuming Doug is okay with it.
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}