[racket-dev] `racket/regexp'

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Fri Jun 22 12:38:58 EDT 2012

Adding a `regexp-replaces' leads to the question of where to add it:
`racket/string' makes sense more than `racket/private/string' since
it's really not something that should be considered core.  But to make
it correspond to `regexp-replace*' it should deal with both strings
and bytes, so `racket/string' is not a good place for it.

Maybe there should be a new `racket/regexp'?  In addition to the new
function, some functions from `racket/private/string' could move there
too.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the dev mailing list.