[racket-dev] syntax/syntax proposal

On 2012-06-15 15:12:05 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote:
> I've attached a patch that implements this. Any comments?

Just realized after I sent it that I'd change two things in the patch:
  * `syntax-null?`, `syntax-pair?`, `syntax-list?` would be defined
    using `procedure-rename` to get better contract error messages.
  * the `#:rest` contract is wrong, it'd really be `(listof syntax-list?)`

And of course there'd be documentation in the final version too.

Cheers,
Asumu