[racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Wed Jul 11 19:18:56 EDT 2012

Would "tuning" work?

And can you say more about how the whackers made this distinction? Is
the issues that optimizing things doesn't always improve
performance... maybe?

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Keep in mind that we were whacked for using 'performance' when we really meant 'optimization'.
> I kind of like the 'tools' idea. I can see that it is too broad (a spell checking tool shouldn't co-habit with a visualizer for futures) but a tools collections with sub-collections for various things sounds good to me:
>  tools/
>     stepper/
>     macro-stepper
>     optimizations/
>     future-visualuzation/
>     editing/
> and so on would work.

Posted on the dev mailing list.