[racket-dev] [plt] Push #24367: master branch updated

Oh, and just in case, I'm pretty sure this is a 64 bit build (I forget
the official way to check, but I think that this counts)

> (fixnum? (expt 2 40))
#t

Robby

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> At Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:21:24 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
>>> Last I heard, Eli was saying that there was something seriously wrong
>>> with 'raco setup' on two cores. Did that ever get resolved?
>>
>> Commits 012ef60cd545ba and 534886dbe4b6ad (yesterday) were in response
>> and improved things on my machine, so it's probably worth checking again.
>>
>
> Here's what I get. Looks like we see improvements to 3 or so places
> and then don't anymore. But there also doesn't seem to be any bad
> behavior in there, at least for me (on dual quad-core 2.8 ghz xeon
> processors).
>
> time raco setup -Dj 1
> [...]
> real    17m26.143s
> user    14m19.715s
> sys     2m39.913s
>
>
> time raco setup -Dj 2
> [...]
> real    9m16.022s
> user    13m14.917s
> sys     3m49.053s
>
>
> time raco setup -Dj 3
> [...]
> real    7m57.370s
> user    13m50.130s
> sys     5m15.396s
>
> time raco setup -Dj 4
> [...]
> real    7m19.843s
> user    14m12.368s
> sys     6m45.303s
>
>
> time raco setup -Dj 5
> [...]
> real    7m12.761s
> user    14m43.506s
> sys     8m47.768s
>
>
> time raco setup -Dj 6
> [...]
> real    7m16.931s
> user    15m9.667s
> sys     10m46.150s
>
> time raco setup -Dj 7
> [...]
> real    7m29.394s
> user    15m30.409s
> sys     12m44.665s
>
> time raco setup -Dj 8
> [...]
> real    7m29.394s
> user    15m30.409s
> sys     12m44.665s
>
> Robby