[racket-dev] collections with no one responsible

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> Just now, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>>
>> For `tests', there are currently 3 files with no one responsible at
>> the top level:
>>  - eli-tester.rkt
>>  - info.rkt
>>  - run-automated-tests.rkt
>>
>> I think they should all have you as responsible, and I'll leave the
>> dir the way it is.  Does that seem reasonable?
>
> Yes.
>
> [Fine for the first (which would eventually move to a proper place),
> and for the second (meaningless for drdr, but fine for the janitorial
> stuff).  I guess that the third is fine for the same reason.]

Done.

> The obvious problem with a default owner is that new directories get
> added and inherit that owner.  Also, it would be good to run a script
> that checks that all source files are owned.

Yes, that's a good idea.  I'll do that.
-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu