[racket-dev] Embedding racket in vim

+correct vim group.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Eric Dobson <eric.n.dobson at gmail.com>wrote:

> I have recently installed a version of vim with the mzscheme option
> enabled. And it sortof works except that some times it segfaults or has
> other memory corruption issues. So I enabled MZ_GC_CHECK when compiling
> vim, and now I get the corruption every single time on startup.
>
> Here is the output from gdb when running it:
>
> GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-1820) (Sat Jun 16 02:40:11 UTC
> 2012)
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
> are
> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> conditions.
> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-apple-darwin"...
> warning: Unable to read symbols for
> Racket.framework/Versions/5.3.1.9_3m/Racket (file not found).
>
> warning: Unable to read symbols from "Racket" (not yet mapped into memory).
> Reading symbols for shared libraries .......... done
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /Users/endobson/proj/vim/install/bin/vim
> Reading symbols for shared libraries
> ++++.+++++.......................................................................................................................................
> done
> Reading symbols for shared libraries . done
> ?: bad module path
>   in: #<bad-value>
>   context...:
>    standard-module-name-resolver
>
> Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
> Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x00000000000000a0
> 0x0000000100328d99 in scheme_top_level_do_worker (dyn_state=0x0,
> k=0x7fff5fbfdd10, eb=1000, new_thread=1606409488) at fun.c:1227
> 1227            scheme_longjmp(*save, 1);
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x0000000100328d99 in scheme_top_level_do_worker (dyn_state=0x0,
> k=0x7fff5fbfdd10, eb=1000, new_thread=1606409488) at fun.c:1227
> #1  0x00000001003ff41e in _module_resolve (modidx=0x103004150,
> stx=0x103004068, env=0x0, load_it=1) at module.c:3860
> #2  0x000000010041162a in parse_requires () at schthread.h:376
> #3  0x00000001004122e4 in do_namespace_require () at module.c:7685
> #4  0x00000001004123ce in scheme_namespace_require (r=0x103ec8008) at
> module.c:1316
> #5  0x00000001001574dd in _mh_execute_header ()
> #6  0x00000001001585d8 in _mh_execute_header ()
> #7  0x000000010005bc43 in _mh_execute_header ()
> #8  0x000000010004ca4a in _mh_execute_header ()
> #9  0x000000010015f608 in _mh_execute_header ()
> #10 0x00000001002a6093 in call_with_basic (data=0x103ec8008) at
> schthread.h:376
> #11 0x00000001002a64a8 in scheme_main_setup (no_auto_statics=1606414024,
> _main=0x7fff5fbfe268, argc=6433496, argv=0x7fff5fbfe240) at salloc.c:194
> #12 0x0000000100161fff in _mh_execute_header ()
> #13 0x00007fff939eb7e1 in start ()
> (gdb)
>
> I can include more information if you can tell me what is useful.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20121210/dcc31c62/attachment-0001.html>