[racket-dev] FFI: pointer to an array in a C struct type
At Mon, 3 Dec 2012 12:31:37 +0100, Tobias Hammer wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 11:45:08 +0100, Neil Toronto <neil.toronto at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This error seems wrong:
> >
> >
> > #lang racket
> >
> > (require ffi/unsafe
> > ffi/unsafe/cvector)
> >
> > (define-cstruct _mpz ([alloc _int]
> > [size _int]
> > [limbs (_gcable _cvector)]))
> >
> > (define z (make-mpz 1 1 (list->cvector '(1) _long)))
> > (mpz-limbs z)
> >
> > >>> _cvector: cannot automatically convert a C pointer to a cvector
> >
> >
> > The error might be correct, though late and confusing, if a cvector's
> > "base representation" isn't a pointer type. Is it?
>
> The base representation should be a pointer but the length and type
> information to convert it back to a cvector is missing. Whats stored
> inside the struct is only a plain pointer, without the information you
> supplied to make-mpz, and because of this _cvector only has a
> racket->c-conversion (see ffi/unsafe/cvector.rkt).
>
> > If that error is correct, then how are FFI users meant to define a C
> > struct that has a "long *" field that points to an array? I've not yet
> > managed to define one whose instances survive a garbage collection cycle
> > without using (_gcable _cvector). Here's one of my desperate attempts:
> >
> >
> > #lang racket
> >
> > (require ffi/unsafe
> > ffi/unsafe/cvector)
> >
> > (define-cstruct _mpz ([alloc _int] [size _int] [limbs _gcpointer]))
> >
> > (define z (make-mpz 1 1 (cvector-ptr (list->cvector '(1) _long))))
> >
> > > (ptr-ref (mpz-limbs z) _long 0)
> > 1
> > > (collect-garbage)
> > > (ptr-ref (mpz-limbs z) _long 0)
> > 139856348920568
> >
> >
> > I mean to be complain-y this time. This shouldn't be this hard to figure
> > out.
>
> I guess the problem here is, that the gc only knows memory with only
> pointers (to gcable memory) inside and (atomic) memory without any
> pointers it should follow. You try to mix them up. make-mpz should malloc
> (see ffi docs) atomic memory and you put a pointer managed by the gc into
> it. The pointer gets relocated on gc, but the ref inside the struct is not
> known and not updated.
>
> I unfortunately don't know a simple, gc- and typesafe way to put pointers
> inside structs. My attempts to get around this were pretty hacking (using
> a raw malloc'd pointer, embed a struct with plain values as pointer inside
> an interor-malloc'd struct together with all others pointers, etc).
> I would be really interested in a way to accomplish this, too.
Yes. I've thought about this, but for the libraries I've written, the
cases where the GC can really solve the problem automatically seem
relatively rare, so I haven't been sufficiently motivated for my own
uses.
In the `_mpz' example above, the presence of both `alloc' and `size'
suggests that a callee might be responsible for malloc()ing `limbs' if
there's not already enough room. If so, `_gcpointer' isn't the right
type. Maybe this example doesn't actually go that way, but it's a
typical problem.
Neil, can you say more about how `_mpz' instances are used with foreign
functions?