[racket-dev] repl, void, multiple values.

Hello,

not an important point, just a simple observation that I don't
remember having ever seen raised:
the repl not printing the void object, sometimes creates ambiguities.

Example, given:

(define (ok)
  'ok)

(define (not-ok)
  (let ((answer 40))
    (set! answer (+ answer 2))))

and at the repl:

> (values (ok)
          (not-ok))
'ok
> (values (not-ok)
          (ok))
'ok

omitting void loses information about which value is which.

====

I made a mistake similar to the not-ok function in real code,
and the ensuing interaction at the repl confused me for a minute or two.
Had I seen
'ok
#<void>
I would have seen immediately my mistake.

Would be sensible to print all the values, even the void value, when
there's more than one value to print?

Cheers
P.