[racket-dev] provide specs in eopl in repository use (all-defined-out) instead of (all-defined)

On 4/2/12 8:42 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid wrote:
> OK, thanks. Just wanted to make sure something wasn't broken. It's
> only a minor inconvenience - my students are using the version from
> the download page, while I usually use one built from source, but I've
> just been using the regular 5.2.1 version to run their programs. In
> any event, perhaps the documentation needs to be updated: the entry:
>    http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/eopl/index.html#(form._((lib._eopl/eopl..rkt)._provide))
> points to the mzscheme version of provide.

(Sorry I missed this thread.)  Thanks for the report.  I filed a bug 
report and will fix soon.

David



> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Robby Findler
> <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>  wrote:
>> Because it was changed to be based on "#lang racket" instead of the
>> (old) "#lang mzscheme" not too long ago. I think there was a post here
>> (or on the users's list) about this, but I'm not sure that this
>> particular point was mentioned there, so I can see how you'd be
>> surprised.
>>
>> Is this causing you trouble with classes or similar? Would a "#lang
>> eopl/mzscheme" or something like that be useful for backwards
>> compatibility? (You'd still need to use that #lang line, tho, since
>> the regular eopl language is now changed for good.)
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Nadeem Abdul Hamid<nadeem at acm.org>  wrote:
>>> How come when building Racket from the latest source of the repository
>>> (at least as of 3 days ago), #lang eopl doesn't recognize
>>> (all-defined) as a valid provide spec and wants (all-defined-out)
>>> instead?
>>> --- nadeem
>>> _________________________
>>>   Racket Developers list:
>>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
> _________________________
>    Racket Developers list:
>    http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev