[racket-dev] More places questions

Yeah I think you are right.  I'll commit a change.

Kevin

On 09/30/2011 03:17 PM, John Clements wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 5:28 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:26 AM, John Clements
>> <clements at brinckerhoff.org>  wrote:
>>> I'm guessing that calling place-channel-put with a descriptor pulls out the associated channel... should the docs indicate this?
>> The docs here: http://pre.racket-lang.org/docs/html/reference/places.html?q=place#%28tech._place._descriptor%29
>> say that.
> They do indeed; specifically, they say "Every place descriptor is also a place channel".
>
> But in that case, I think that this program:
>
> #lang racket
>
> (define (main)
>    (define p
>      (place ch
>             3))
>    (place-channel? p))
>
> ... should produce #t, but it produces #f. No?
>
> John
>