[racket-dev] ACM publishing and ArXiv

With a classification system that really hopes that the past twenty
years never happened.  Real useful.  (And I guess it's the ACM's power
to make it look like they never did!)

Shriram

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> ACM conference also classify your paper so
> that people who look for related work and
> may not have quite the right keywords find
> it anyway.
>
> ;; ---
>
> Yesterday Stephen found a paper on tracing
> in a lazy language that, despite its title,
> and despite claims in the introduction,
> comes awfully close to what John published
> in essence in ESOP '01.
>
> But they wrote it in 98 or so.
>
> Why didn't we find it? The authors published
> in some obscure Australian conference.
>
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>
>> So what exactly is the benefit of publishing with ACM these days? Is it just to prove that your paper was peer reviewed?
>>
>> On 09/30/2011 12:02 PM, John Clements wrote:
>>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John Clements wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In case you didn't catch Stephanie Weirich's post of this on plus.google.com, here's some very interesting information about ArXiv and ACM and where copyrights intersect.
>>>>
>>>> It may be that you can avoid much of this by only publishing "draft" versions of your paper on ArXiv; I Am Not A Lawyer.
>>>>
>>> Oh for heaven's sake.  Neglected to post the link.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://r6.ca/blog/20110930T012533Z.html
>>>
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>>
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>