[racket-dev] code coverage coloring

The arrows don't form a tree. But have a look at the docs and see.
Additional layers welcome.

On Wednesday, September 14, 2011, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> A few minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2011, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>> > And it would be really nice if someone makes check-syntax produce
>> > gui-independent information that could be used elsewhere (like
>> > binding arrows appearing in the documentation).
>>
>> Check syntax does this. I essetially had to add that as part of the
>> online check stuff.
>
> Ooh, does it have some convenient interface?  Something like getting
> the arrows as a tree of syntax objects?
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20110914/9f8d2181/attachment.html>