From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu) Date: Thu Oct 20 23:34:43 EDT 2011 |
|
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> Robby privately wrote to say it should be regarded as a bug. > > That is the correct behavior for `racket': [...] Just in case this was not clear from my other messages, I still consider this a bug (not in #lang racket). Our customers (like Shriram in this case) expect things to behave in a consistent way and we should support them in that. IMO. Robby
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|